Skip to main content
honest.aero

NP151311-12R/H windshield

Named on RFQs forEmbraer

What buyers wrote when requesting this part — not an effectivity determination. Confirm applicability against your own approved data.

Based on 3 supplier quotes · Jul 2026. Market prices move; request a current quote.
How these numbers are calculated

Ranges come from real quotes our desk requests from vendors — never a single vendor’s price, and never fewer than 3 quotes from at least 2 vendors.

Median $125,000. Range $85,000 to $165,000 across 3 supplier quotes, condition New.

Not enough market data to publish a fair range. Request a quote — we'll source it live and our numbers get better for the next buyer.
6 quotes for this condition, but one supplier accounts for more than 60% of them. A range built on that would describe one supplier's pricing while looking like a market, so we don't publish it. Request a quote — we'll source it live and our numbers get better for the next buyer.
No supplier quotes for this condition yet. Request a quote — we'll source it live and our numbers get better for the next buyer.
Requested, last 12 months
3×
Typical lead time
0–30 days
Quotes observed
10

What NP151311-12 is

NP151311-12 is a right-hand (R/H) cockpit windshield. Three independent published sources give that designation for this exact part number, and one of them records it as electrically heated. The requests that reached our desk described it only as a windshield, and one carried a position qualifier that was mistranscribed. We publish the corrected designation because handedness is a physical fact about the panel. A left-hand and a right-hand windshield are different part numbers even where they look symmetrical, and the wrong side will not fit an aperture you have already opened. Confirm the part number and the position against your own illustrated parts catalogue before ordering. Requests for this part number have also been associated with Embraer aircraft. That is a platform string a buyer wrote on a request, not effectivity data. Our sources also disagree on who manufactures the panel, so this page names no manufacturer and claims no applicability. No manufacturer was recorded on any RFQ line and none was stated in a labelled field of any supplier quote. The external sources that corroborate the designation do not agree with each other on who makes it, so this page names no manufacturer. A catalogue record suggests one, and it is not a source we publish from.

Get quotes for NP151311-12

A short list, not the full one. Pick the closest or choose Other and tell us in the notes. We check export eligibility by hand before quoting; this field does not.

Acceptable conditions

Every request is sourced by hand. We’ll come back to you either way, usually within 2 business days and faster on AOG. Some parts are export-controlled; we verify eligibility before quoting.

8130-3 / EASA Form 1 trace · Incoterms 2020 · 1,349 RFQs sourced

Condition guidance for NP151311-12

Published market data covers new only, and that band sits exactly on our publication floor: the minimum quote count and the minimum independent supplier count at the same time. Read the median as indicative rather than as a rate. Two other conditions were quoted and are not published. Overhauled drew one quote from one supplier, which is nothing to aggregate. Serviceable drew six quotes, more than the published new band, from the same number of independent suppliers as that band. One of those suppliers wrote a disqualifying share of them. More quotes did not make it publishable. What the threshold measures is how independent the observations are and how they spread across suppliers, not how many there are. If you want serviceable, ask us and we will source it live.

Eight quotes stated a lead time. Five of them recorded a lead time of 0 days, the median was 0 days, and the 75th percentile was 30 days. A recorded lead time of 0 days is what the supplier wrote on the quote, and it is not a statement about inventory. Three RFQ lines reached our desk across three separate requests, the most recent on 13 July 2026. None was flagged AOG. The DLA PUB LOG returned no NSN cross-reference for this part number, so there is no verified alternate to offer.

Frequently asked

Because a count is not the test. The serviceable quotes came from the same number of independent suppliers as the published new band. One of those suppliers wrote a disqualifying share of them. A range built on that would mostly describe one company while presenting itself as a market. The published new band comes from three suppliers with no one of them dominant. Our methodology sets out every check a band has to pass.

It is at our minimum on both counts at once: the fewest quotes and the fewest independent suppliers we will publish. It is a real signal about the order of magnitude and a weak one about the exact number. Request a quote for anything you are actually going to buy.

We cannot tell you that. Requests for it have been associated with Embraer aircraft, but that is what a buyer wrote on a request, and it is not effectivity data. This is the right-hand panel, so the side matters as much as the part number. Confirm both against your own illustrated parts catalogue and your approved data.

Eight quotes stated a lead time. Five recorded 0 days, the median was 0 days, and the 75th percentile was 30 days. The gap between those figures is wide, so confirm the position and the delivery date together before you plan around either.

Prices are aggregated from quotes our sourcing desk requested from suppliers — never a single supplier’s price. Each is parsed automatically and spot-checked by a human when we quote it to a buyer; not every quote in this range has had that second look. Our methodology explains how we check them. Generated 2026-09-11 · Reviewed by Austin Stout · September 2026. Have a correction? Email hello@honest.aero.

Related parts