766352Aram air turbine
What buyers wrote when requesting this part — not an effectivity determination. Confirm applicability against your own approved data.
How these numbers are calculated
Ranges come from real quotes our desk requests from vendors — never a single vendor’s price, and never fewer than 3 quotes from at least 2 vendors.
Median $125,000. Range $105,000 to $140,000 across 10 supplier quotes, condition Overhauled.
- Requested, last 12 months
- 5×
- Typical lead time
- From stock
- Quotes observed
- 10
What 766352A is
A ram air turbine — a RAT — described on real RFQs as "RAM AIR TURBINE" and "Ram Air Turbine Assembly". Requests for this part number have been associated with A318 and A320 aircraft. No manufacturer was recorded on any RFQ line, so this page does not name one — confirm the make, the effectivity, and your eligibility to install it through your own approvals. Because a RAT only matters on the day everything else has failed, its paperwork and its overhaul history deserve more scrutiny than a part of similar value that runs every flight.
Condition guidance for 766352A
Only overhauled is published here, and that reflects how this part actually trades: every usable quote we hold for it is overhauled. No new, serviceable, or as-removed quotes reached the aggregation, so those tabs are empty rather than suppressed — there was nothing to suppress. A few quotes for this part stated a condition this site does not publish, such as new surplus or repairable, and those are excluded by design rather than folded into a neighbouring band. The overhauled range is tight for a part at this value: $105,000 to $140,000, median $125,000, from 10 quotes across 5 suppliers. A $35,000 spread on a six-figure unit is narrow enough that the market has a clear view of what this costs, which is unusual and useful. It also means there is less room to negotiate than on a part with a wider band — if a quote comes back well outside this range in either direction, the question is what makes that unit different, not who is being greedy.
Availability is the striking figure here. Of the 10 quotes that stated a lead time, 8 offered stock and the median was 0 days. For an emergency-power component that is a comfortable position to be in: the part is held, by several suppliers, and an AOG situation is unlikely to be blocked by sourcing. Demand is steady rather than heavy — 5 RFQ lines across 5 separate requests, none flagged AOG. Five different buyers asking once each is a more useful signal than one buyer asking five times, and it is part of why the price band here is as coherent as it is. No alternate part numbers were found. The DLA PUB LOG returned no NSN cross-reference for this part number, which is common for commercial rotables that never entered the federal supply system. That is an absence of data rather than evidence that no alternate exists.
Frequently asked
The sourcing data does not establish it, so this page will not guess. No manufacturer was entered on any RFQ line for this part number and no supplier stated one in a labelled field of their quote. A parts-catalogue record suggests a maker, but that source is wrong often enough that we treat it as a lead to check rather than a fact to publish. Ask the supplier, and ask for the trace document.
Because overhauled is all we hold usable quotes for. This is not a range suppressed for thin data — no new, serviceable, or as-removed quotes reached the aggregation at all. If you need one of those conditions, request it and we will source it.
Fast, on this evidence: 8 of the 10 quotes stating a lead time offered stock, with a median of 0 days. Confirm the date in writing — a stock claim is a claim until it is on a packing list.
It is narrower than most. Across the parts we publish, a range that tight on a six-figure rotable suggests suppliers broadly agree on the value. Treat a quote far outside it as a question about that specific unit — its overhaul scope, its documents, its remaining life — rather than as a bargain or a rip-off.
An overhauled rotable should carry a return-to-service record. See our [8130-3 guide](/guides/8130-3-verification) for what that document does and does not prove. For a RAT in particular, ask what the overhaul actually covered and whether the deployment mechanism was functionally tested.
Prices are aggregated from quotes our sourcing desk requested from suppliers — never a single supplier’s price. Each is parsed automatically and spot-checked by a human when we quote it to a buyer; not every quote in this range has had that second look. Our methodology explains how we check them. Generated 2026-09-11 · Reviewed by Austin Stout · September 2026. Have a correction? Email hello@honest.aero.