4323100-01-6622galley oven
What buyers wrote when requesting this part — not an effectivity determination. Confirm applicability against your own approved data.
How these numbers are calculated
Ranges come from real quotes our desk requests from vendors — never a single vendor’s price, and never fewer than 3 quotes from at least 2 vendors.
Median $11,000. Range $10,500 to $16,500 across 4 supplier quotes, condition Overhauled.
How these numbers are calculated
Ranges come from real quotes our desk requests from vendors — never a single vendor’s price, and never fewer than 3 quotes from at least 2 vendors.
Median $12,000. Range $6,000 to $15,000 across 8 supplier quotes, condition Serviceable.
- Requested, last 12 months
- 2×
- Typical lead time
- 0–7 days
- Quotes observed
- 12
What 4323100-01-6622 is
Buyers on real RFQs describe this part as an "OVEN" — galley cabin equipment rather than a flight-critical rotable. Requests for it have been associated with the Airbus A319, but no manufacturer was recorded on any RFQ line for this part number, so this page does not name one. A catalog record exists that suggests a manufacturer; it is an unverified hint from a source that is wrong often enough that we do not publish from it. Ask the supplier, and confirm effectivity against your own configuration.
Condition guidance for 4323100-01-6622
Two conditions carry enough quotes to publish, and the serviceable data here is the stronger of the two. Serviceable runs $6,000 to $15,000 with a median of $12,000, from 8 quotes across 8 suppliers — every quote from a different supplier, which is the most independent spread any part on this site currently has. Overhauled runs $10,500 to $16,500 with a median of $11,000, from 4 quotes across 4 suppliers. The published medians put serviceable $1,000 above overhauled, which looks backwards. Do not read anything into it. The overhauled figure rests on 4 quotes against serviceable's 8, the two ranges overlap across almost their whole width, and the gap is smaller before rounding than the published increment makes it look. Compare any two quotes from these two sets at random and the overhauled one is as likely to be the higher of the pair — there is no serviceable premium here, only a thin sample. Treat the overhauled median as indicative rather than as a rate, and treat the two conditions as the same money. What actually separates them on this part is the paperwork and the physical condition of the unit, not the price. Cabin equipment also tends to be priced on cosmetic condition and on whether the unit carries current certification, neither of which is captured by a condition code. Ask what the unit actually looks like.
Lead times are short: of the 12 quotes stating one, the median was 1 day and 6 offered stock, with the 75th percentile at 7 days. For a galley item on a scheduled maintenance visit, that means availability is unlikely to be the constraint. No alternate part numbers were found — the DLA PUB LOG returned no NSN cross-reference, which is common for cabin equipment that never entered the federal supply system. That is an absence of data, not evidence that no alternate exists. Demand is at the low end: 2 RFQ lines across 2 RFQs, neither marked AOG. The pricing depth comes from how many suppliers answered, not from how often it has been requested.
Frequently asked
The sourcing data does not establish it. No manufacturer was entered on either RFQ line for this part number. A catalog record suggests one, but that source has been wrong on parts we have checked — it attributes at least one Bombardier part number to a rocket company — so we treat it as a lead to verify rather than a fact to publish. Ask the supplier for the manufacturer and the certification before you buy.
It isn't, really. The published medians differ by $1,000 in that direction, but the overhauled figure comes from 4 quotes against serviceable's 8, and the two ranges overlap almost entirely. Pick one quote from each set at random and the overhauled one is as likely to be higher. The apparent inversion is a small sample, not a market signal, so we are not going to invent a reason for it. Decide between the two on paperwork and physical condition instead.
Of the 12 quotes that stated a lead time, the median was 1 day and 6 offered stock. The 75th percentile was 7 days.
Galley equipment quotes in this corpus arrive with a wider mix of documents than rotables do — some with an 8130-3, some on an EASA Form 1, some on a manufacturer's Certificate of Conformance. Decide what your operation requires before you compare prices, because the document affects what you are actually buying. Our [8130-3 guide](/guides/8130-3-verification) uses this part as its worked example for exactly that reason.
2 RFQ lines across 2 RFQs, both within the last 12 months, neither marked AOG.
Prices are aggregated from quotes our sourcing desk requested from suppliers — never a single supplier’s price. Each is parsed automatically and spot-checked by a human when we quote it to a buyer; not every quote in this range has had that second look. Our methodology explains how we check them. Generated 2026-09-11 · Reviewed by Austin Stout · September 2026. Have a correction? Email hello@honest.aero.